Many people who are suffering from a long-term or terminal illness wish to end their suffering in a humane and dignified way. This has recently become a controversial topic in the United States as more people advocate for the right to end their own lives. Today, there are a handful of assisted suicide states in America that allow this.
Oregon has allowed physician-assisted deaths since 1994. These rules came into effect in 1998. Since that time, more than three hundred terminally ill people have used this law to bring about their deaths.
There is also a concern about prejudices against the disabled arising from these laws. This is because do not resuscitate orders are more often used for a person who is hospitalized with a severe disability. A person with a lifelong disability may also suffer from burn out and feelings of depression from many years of prejudice and intolerance in society. These individuals are believed to be more likely to refuse treatment and therefore end their lives prematurely.
There may also be the problem of conflicting roles for physicians as many doctors believe that these changes would affect the relationship between doctors and their patients. While a doctor is meant to preserve life, many advocates argue for the right of an individual to die when they see fit.
In Vermont, the state legislature passed a law called End of Life Choices in May 2013. This law allows patients to have a doctor-assisted death if they have been diagnosed with having six months or less to live, as confirmed by two doctors. This was the first political institution in the U. S to pass such a law. It is important to note that in Oregon and Washington, the decision was made by the voters.
There is also the issue of religious ethics. Many religions in principle do not support the idea of doctors using their skills and knowledge to bring an end to the life of a patient. For example, Buddhism urges people to refrain from deliberately killing another living being. Judeo-Christian beliefs also condemn suicide as an affront to the gift of life from the Creator.
The patient should try to get in contact with an attorney who is familiar with right-to-life issues of this nature. They should get competent legal advice on what their state allows and does not allow. They do not want to risk prosecution from trying to initiate something that has not been legally sanctioned.
In addition, it is believed that many vulnerable people are at risk of an untimely death because they might be subjected to these procedures without their consent. However, some studies claim that legalizing these procedures may decrease the occurrences of involuntary euthanasia.
Oregon has allowed physician-assisted deaths since 1994. These rules came into effect in 1998. Since that time, more than three hundred terminally ill people have used this law to bring about their deaths.
There is also a concern about prejudices against the disabled arising from these laws. This is because do not resuscitate orders are more often used for a person who is hospitalized with a severe disability. A person with a lifelong disability may also suffer from burn out and feelings of depression from many years of prejudice and intolerance in society. These individuals are believed to be more likely to refuse treatment and therefore end their lives prematurely.
There may also be the problem of conflicting roles for physicians as many doctors believe that these changes would affect the relationship between doctors and their patients. While a doctor is meant to preserve life, many advocates argue for the right of an individual to die when they see fit.
In Vermont, the state legislature passed a law called End of Life Choices in May 2013. This law allows patients to have a doctor-assisted death if they have been diagnosed with having six months or less to live, as confirmed by two doctors. This was the first political institution in the U. S to pass such a law. It is important to note that in Oregon and Washington, the decision was made by the voters.
There is also the issue of religious ethics. Many religions in principle do not support the idea of doctors using their skills and knowledge to bring an end to the life of a patient. For example, Buddhism urges people to refrain from deliberately killing another living being. Judeo-Christian beliefs also condemn suicide as an affront to the gift of life from the Creator.
The patient should try to get in contact with an attorney who is familiar with right-to-life issues of this nature. They should get competent legal advice on what their state allows and does not allow. They do not want to risk prosecution from trying to initiate something that has not been legally sanctioned.
In addition, it is believed that many vulnerable people are at risk of an untimely death because they might be subjected to these procedures without their consent. However, some studies claim that legalizing these procedures may decrease the occurrences of involuntary euthanasia.
No comments:
Post a Comment