Friday 17 March 2017

Effects Of Concrete Replacement Tulsa OK

By Paul Rogers


Building and construction back dates to the first stages of civilization. Human beings have evolved and learned to apply different materials and skills to construct different structures. Over the years, concrete replacement Tulsa OK has been used to build a variety of infrastructure more than any other material. Economists encourage the use of the material while environmentalists discourage it for various reasons. Their points of view are depicted below.

This is a material that can be used to construct features with a variety of shapes. This is possible due to its original form where it is turned into different shapes as a sub-solid before drying and taking shape later as a hard object. This way, it becomes easy to design and implement the design into the actual project. This unique quality makes it exceptional from many substitute materials.

Its availability is another factor that prevails over most materials. The substitutes are available in most regions around the globe. Thus, it becomes relatively cheaper to build with the material due to accessibility as opposed to imported materials from other areas. Most buildings are made of concrete as it is available and affordable to many residents than other building materials such as glass.

One factor that overshadows other materials is the durability. Structures built from this material in Tulsa OK can last longer than those made up of substitutes. Most people go for this product since they plan to make something that will serve them in the long run. It is also easy to renovate a worn out concrete building and restore its original beauty.

However, this material has adverse consequences to the environment. The substitutes of the materials are sand, and cement. During their extraction from the ground, a lot of dust is released into the air lowering the quality. More so, cement companies release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere contributing to global warming. Residents will continue to suffer these consequences as far as these industries will remain in place.

On the same side of the coin, transportation of the materials involves the use of heavy trucks. These meander through the streets of Tulsa OK emitting burnt gases through their exhaust pipes. This too contributes to a number of harmful oxides that lead to the greenhouse effect. The trucks destroy the infrastructure raising the cost of maintenance by the government.

In as much as there is a need to come up with alternative building materials, the substitutes are not enough to meet the demand in the market. More so, many options are expensive to apply as compared to the use of concrete. This will render it more preferable by many proprietors existing or joining the industry. People usually choose the product that is more affordable and easy to apply.

Analyzing the above arguments, it can be concluded that the material has more economic benefits in the long run over other substances. Consequently, it has proven to have adverse effects on the environment due to air pollution. The latter can be solved by replacing its use with different substances. This would be expensive but environmental friendly. Therefore, merging the two points of view, we can insist on controlled production of cement, ballast, and sand where gases released in the air should be reacted to form harmless matter at the chimneys.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment